+41.1%
CLS vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+141.0%
-41.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -3.8% | +4.6% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +4.6% | -8.0% | +12.6% | +4.5% |
| 30D | -13.9% | -27.9% | +14.0% | -14.0% |
| 3M | -26.6% | -74.6% | +48.0% | -28.6% |
| 6M | +15.4% | -99.5% | +114.9% | -2.8% |
| YTD | +5.7% | -99.7% | +105.4% | -16.9% |
| 1Y | +41.1% | -99.9% | +141.0% | +4.0% |
| All | +41.1% | -99.9% | +141.0% | +4.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling