-29.6%
CLS vs LPLA
-16.5%
-13.1%
-50.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.1% | +4.6% | -13.7% | -9.4% |
| 7D | -21.1% | +15.7% | -36.9% | -22.6% |
| 30D | -38.2% | -6.2% | -32.0% | -37.1% |
| 3M | -36.3% | -12.0% | -24.3% | -33.8% |
| 6M | -43.8% | -2.7% | -41.1% | -43.7% |
| YTD | -20.0% | -12.5% | -7.5% | -20.5% |
| 1Y | -29.6% | -16.5% | -13.1% | -22.3% |
| All | -29.6% | -16.5% | -13.1% | -22.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling