+41.1%
CLS vs EQT
+7.9%
+33.3%
-41.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EQT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.8% | -0.8% | +1.6% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +4.6% | +1.1% | +3.5% | +4.6% |
| 30D | -13.9% | +7.7% | -21.6% | -13.8% |
| 3M | -26.6% | +0.2% | -26.8% | -26.0% |
| 6M | +15.4% | -9.5% | +24.9% | +18.5% |
| YTD | +5.7% | +3.8% | +1.8% | +5.8% |
| 1Y | +41.1% | +7.8% | +33.4% | +47.9% |
| All | +41.1% | +7.9% | +33.3% | +47.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EQT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EQT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EQT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EQT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling