+32.1%
CL vs NIO
-54.1%
+86.2%
-17.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.3% | +3.4% | -0.2% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +7.7% | -0.6% | +8.3% | +7.7% |
| 30D | +15.2% | -3.5% | +18.7% | +15.1% |
| 3M | +7.3% | -30.7% | +38.0% | +6.1% |
| 6M | +17.0% | -45.6% | +62.6% | +15.2% |
| YTD | +28.0% | -35.3% | +63.3% | +26.6% |
| 1Y | +32.1% | -53.9% | +86.0% | +34.1% |
| All | +32.1% | -54.1% | +86.2% | +34.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling