+67.8%
CHYM vs LNT
+13.9%
+53.9%
-41.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.9% | +2.3% | +3.6% | +7.0% |
| 7D | +3.7% | +7.2% | -3.4% | +7.4% |
| 30D | +5.6% | +15.6% | -10.0% | +14.1% |
| 3M | +19.7% | +5.2% | +14.5% | +22.0% |
| 6M | +35.3% | +1.7% | +33.6% | +36.4% |
| YTD | +18.7% | +17.0% | +1.7% | +31.5% |
| 1Y | +67.8% | +14.2% | +53.6% | +87.2% |
| All | +67.8% | +13.9% | +53.9% | +87.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling