+17.3%
CHRW vs NIO
-37.4%
+54.7%
-32.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -1.6% | +2.2% | +0.7% |
| 7D | -1.8% | -13.0% | +11.2% | -1.6% |
| 30D | -3.9% | -18.3% | +14.4% | -3.6% |
| 3M | -19.7% | -33.2% | +13.5% | -19.2% |
| 6M | -21.7% | -21.5% | -0.2% | -21.0% |
| YTD | -7.5% | -25.5% | +18.0% | -6.6% |
| 1Y | +17.3% | -38.0% | +55.3% | +18.6% |
| All | +17.3% | -37.4% | +54.7% | +18.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling