-41.3%
BLDR vs MSTZ
-57.9%
+16.6%
-60.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MSTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.8% | +17.7% | -23.5% | -5.2% |
| 7D | +3.9% | +13.4% | -9.5% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +16.5% | +37.5% | -21.0% | +17.9% |
| 3M | -13.7% | -69.9% | +56.3% | -15.3% |
| 6M | -12.2% | -32.0% | +19.8% | -10.1% |
| YTD | -36.3% | -81.2% | +44.9% | -37.1% |
| 1Y | -41.3% | -56.1% | +14.8% | -40.5% |
| All | -41.3% | -57.9% | +16.6% | -40.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MSTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MSTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MSTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MSTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling