-13.6%
BKNG vs HTZ
-60.6%
+47.0%
-32.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.8% | +9.2% | +0.6% | +9.4% |
| 7D | +15.6% | +18.9% | -3.4% | +14.8% |
| 30D | +8.0% | +26.3% | -18.3% | +7.0% |
| 3M | -11.8% | +49.7% | -61.4% | -13.0% |
| 6M | +3.8% | -61.1% | +64.9% | +5.4% |
| YTD | -19.6% | -56.0% | +36.4% | -20.8% |
| 1Y | -13.6% | -66.4% | +52.8% | -7.7% |
| All | -13.6% | -60.6% | +47.0% | -7.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling