-98.2%
BIYA vs RGEN
+45.2%
-143.4%
-98.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | RGEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -1.2% | -0.6% | -1.4% |
| 7D | +1.3% | -4.9% | +6.3% | +2.7% |
| 30D | -21.0% | +5.7% | -26.7% | -22.3% |
| 3M | -74.3% | +32.4% | -106.8% | -75.6% |
| 6M | -84.6% | +33.2% | -117.8% | -85.1% |
| YTD | -94.2% | +2.3% | -96.4% | -94.5% |
| 1Y | -98.2% | +39.0% | -137.2% | -98.2% |
| All | -98.2% | +45.2% | -143.4% | -98.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RGEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RGEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RGEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RGEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling