-98.2%
BIYA vs EPAM
-32.1%
-66.1%
-98.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.7% | -2.4% | +0.6% | -0.8% |
| 7D | +1.3% | +2.0% | -0.6% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -21.0% | +6.5% | -27.5% | -23.7% |
| 3M | -74.3% | +19.9% | -94.2% | -76.4% |
| 6M | -84.6% | -16.9% | -67.7% | -84.4% |
| YTD | -94.2% | -42.9% | -51.3% | -93.9% |
| 1Y | -98.2% | -30.4% | -67.9% | -98.5% |
| All | -98.2% | -32.1% | -66.1% | -98.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling