+57.8%
BIIB vs EPAM
-32.1%
+89.9%
-14.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EPAM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -2.4% | +0.7% | -1.4% |
| 7D | +1.1% | +2.0% | -0.9% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +6.9% | +6.5% | +0.3% | +5.9% |
| 3M | +12.4% | +19.9% | -7.5% | +9.5% |
| 6M | +16.3% | -16.9% | +33.2% | +17.5% |
| YTD | +25.5% | -42.9% | +68.4% | +32.6% |
| 1Y | +57.8% | -30.4% | +88.2% | +61.0% |
| All | +57.8% | -32.1% | +89.9% | +61.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EPAM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EPAM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EPAM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EPAM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling