+360.5%
BE vs ZTS
-49.3%
+409.9%
-52.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.4% | -0.6% | +8.0% | +7.3% |
| 7D | +20.0% | -2.0% | +22.0% | +20.0% |
| 30D | +7.9% | +1.9% | +6.0% | +8.1% |
| 3M | -13.2% | -4.0% | -9.2% | -12.3% |
| 6M | +53.5% | -39.1% | +92.6% | +75.3% |
| YTD | +191.0% | -38.8% | +229.8% | +232.8% |
| 1Y | +360.5% | -49.6% | +410.1% | +652.3% |
| All | +360.5% | -49.3% | +409.9% | +652.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling