+55.3%
BE vs XLC
-5.6%
+60.9%
-52.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.4% | +3.5% | -9.8% | -7.1% |
| 7D | -12.1% | +1.8% | -13.9% | -12.5% |
| 30D | -30.1% | -6.0% | -24.1% | -29.1% |
| 3M | -12.1% | -6.0% | -6.1% | -11.0% |
| 6M | -30.6% | -9.1% | -21.5% | -25.2% |
| YTD | +130.6% | -10.0% | +140.7% | +149.7% |
| 1Y | +55.3% | -5.8% | +61.1% | +40.5% |
| All | +55.3% | -5.6% | +60.9% | +40.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling