+360.5%
BE vs FROG
+83.7%
+276.8%
-52.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.4% | -3.3% | +10.7% | +7.6% |
| 7D | +20.0% | -11.3% | +31.3% | +21.2% |
| 30D | +7.9% | +3.6% | +4.3% | +7.2% |
| 3M | -13.2% | +1.7% | -14.9% | -13.5% |
| 6M | +53.5% | +123.5% | -70.1% | +40.1% |
| YTD | +191.0% | +40.2% | +150.8% | +175.4% |
| 1Y | +360.5% | +81.0% | +279.5% | +335.8% |
| All | +360.5% | +83.7% | +276.8% | +335.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling