+360.5%
BE vs ASML
+134.2%
+226.3%
-52.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ASML | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +7.4% | +4.2% | +3.2% | +2.6% |
| 7D | +20.0% | +1.1% | +18.9% | +18.2% |
| 30D | +7.9% | +2.2% | +5.7% | +4.9% |
| 3M | -13.2% | -2.3% | -10.9% | -10.0% |
| 6M | +53.5% | +23.0% | +30.5% | +22.6% |
| YTD | +191.0% | +61.1% | +130.0% | +67.0% |
| 1Y | +360.5% | +129.1% | +231.4% | +164.3% |
| All | +360.5% | +134.2% | +226.3% | +164.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ASML.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ASML return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ASML return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ASML wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling