-29.5%
AZO vs VICR
+272.1%
-301.6%
-32.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | VICR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | +5.5% | -5.0% | +0.8% |
| 7D | +0.7% | +0.4% | +0.3% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -2.7% | -13.9% | +11.2% | -3.3% |
| 3M | -3.2% | -38.4% | +35.2% | -4.6% |
| 6M | -19.7% | -7.2% | -12.5% | -21.0% |
| YTD | -12.0% | +72.0% | -84.1% | -10.0% |
| 1Y | -29.5% | +263.3% | -292.8% | -23.7% |
| All | -29.5% | +272.1% | -301.6% | -23.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VICR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VICR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VICR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VICR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling