-29.5%
AZO vs UMAC
+164.0%
-193.5%
-32.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -3.1% | +3.6% | +0.4% |
| 7D | +0.7% | -0.9% | +1.6% | +0.7% |
| 30D | -2.7% | -7.7% | +5.0% | -2.7% |
| 3M | -3.2% | -26.4% | +23.2% | -3.1% |
| 6M | -19.7% | +61.9% | -81.6% | -18.2% |
| YTD | -12.0% | +86.5% | -98.5% | -10.1% |
| 1Y | -29.5% | +156.3% | -185.8% | -28.4% |
| All | -29.5% | +164.0% | -193.5% | -28.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling