-9.5%
AZO vs UMAC
+2.9%
-12.5%
-29.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | -10.9% | +14.8% | +3.6% |
| 7D | +5.3% | -26.0% | +31.4% | +4.6% |
| 30D | +18.4% | -40.3% | +58.8% | +17.1% |
| 3M | +9.8% | -51.1% | +61.0% | +8.3% |
| 6M | -4.5% | -5.6% | +1.1% | -4.4% |
| YTD | -1.9% | +2.3% | -4.2% | -1.1% |
| 1Y | -9.5% | +7.9% | -17.4% | -8.8% |
| All | -9.5% | +2.9% | -12.5% | -8.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling