-29.5%
AZO vs TXT
-1.0%
-28.5%
-32.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -0.4% | +0.9% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +0.7% | -4.8% | +5.5% | +1.6% |
| 30D | -2.7% | -10.6% | +7.9% | -0.8% |
| 3M | -3.2% | -13.2% | +10.0% | -1.2% |
| 6M | -19.7% | -20.3% | +0.6% | -17.3% |
| YTD | -12.0% | -9.3% | -2.8% | -10.3% |
| 1Y | -29.5% | -2.7% | -26.8% | -27.7% |
| All | -29.5% | -1.0% | -28.5% | -27.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling