-29.5%
AZO vs SCHG
+16.6%
-46.2%
-32.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | SCHG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -0.9% | +1.4% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +0.7% | -0.7% | +1.4% | +0.8% |
| 30D | -2.7% | +0.2% | -2.9% | -2.7% |
| 3M | -3.2% | +2.2% | -5.4% | -3.2% |
| 6M | -19.7% | +15.0% | -34.8% | -21.9% |
| YTD | -12.0% | +9.2% | -21.2% | -15.3% |
| 1Y | -29.5% | +15.7% | -45.2% | -32.2% |
| All | -29.5% | +16.6% | -46.2% | -32.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside SCHG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus SCHG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × SCHG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded SCHG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling