-29.5%
AZO vs NIO
-37.4%
+7.9%
-32.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -1.6% | +2.1% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +0.7% | -13.0% | +13.8% | +0.5% |
| 30D | -2.7% | -18.3% | +15.6% | -3.0% |
| 3M | -3.2% | -33.2% | +30.0% | -3.7% |
| 6M | -19.7% | -21.5% | +1.7% | -20.4% |
| YTD | -12.0% | -25.5% | +13.5% | -12.9% |
| 1Y | -29.5% | -38.0% | +8.5% | -32.0% |
| All | -29.5% | -37.4% | +7.9% | -32.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling