-29.5%
AZO vs BIYA
-98.3%
+68.8%
-32.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIYA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -1.7% | +2.3% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +0.7% | +1.3% | -0.6% | +0.7% |
| 30D | -2.7% | -21.0% | +18.3% | -2.5% |
| 3M | -3.2% | -74.3% | +71.1% | -3.5% |
| 6M | -19.7% | -84.6% | +64.9% | -19.8% |
| YTD | -12.0% | -94.2% | +82.1% | -12.5% |
| 1Y | -29.5% | -98.2% | +68.7% | -29.9% |
| All | -29.5% | -98.3% | +68.8% | -29.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIYA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIYA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIYA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIYA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling