-9.5%
AZO vs BIIB
+68.6%
-78.2%
-29.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BIIB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.9% | +2.2% | +1.7% | +3.4% |
| 7D | +5.3% | +4.3% | +1.1% | +4.4% |
| 30D | +18.4% | +13.8% | +4.6% | +15.2% |
| 3M | +9.8% | +22.1% | -12.2% | +5.2% |
| 6M | -4.5% | +35.9% | -40.4% | -11.0% |
| YTD | -1.9% | +44.6% | -46.5% | -10.5% |
| 1Y | -9.5% | +70.4% | -79.9% | -18.5% |
| All | -9.5% | +68.6% | -78.2% | -18.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BIIB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BIIB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BIIB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BIIB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling