+46.1%
ASML vs ZTS
-26.9%
+73.1%
-24.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.6% | +7.5% | -11.1% | -3.2% |
| 7D | -10.0% | +15.4% | -25.4% | -9.4% |
| 30D | -19.4% | +25.8% | -45.2% | -19.0% |
| 3M | -12.5% | +18.1% | -30.6% | -11.9% |
| 6M | +8.2% | -19.7% | +28.0% | +17.7% |
| YTD | +40.7% | -27.5% | +68.2% | +59.5% |
| 1Y | +46.1% | -26.7% | +72.9% | +65.5% |
| All | +46.1% | -26.9% | +73.1% | +65.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling