+129.1%
ASML vs XLC
0.0%
+129.1%
-22.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | -1.2% | +5.4% | +4.6% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -0.8% | +2.0% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +2.2% | +1.0% | +1.1% | +1.6% |
| 3M | -2.3% | -0.7% | -1.6% | -0.4% |
| 6M | +23.0% | -5.1% | +28.1% | +29.8% |
| YTD | +61.1% | -4.3% | +65.3% | +68.8% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | -0.6% | +129.7% | +133.3% |
| All | +129.1% | 0.0% | +129.1% | +133.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling