+46.1%
ASML vs LPLA
-16.5%
+62.6%
-24.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LPLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.6% | +4.6% | -8.2% | -3.9% |
| 7D | -10.0% | +15.7% | -25.7% | -11.3% |
| 30D | -19.4% | -6.2% | -13.3% | -18.7% |
| 3M | -12.5% | -12.0% | -0.5% | -10.9% |
| 6M | +8.2% | -2.7% | +11.0% | +8.4% |
| YTD | +40.7% | -12.5% | +53.3% | +42.3% |
| 1Y | +46.1% | -16.5% | +62.7% | +54.9% |
| All | +46.1% | -16.5% | +62.6% | +54.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LPLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LPLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LPLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LPLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling