+129.1%
ASML vs CTAS
-1.7%
+130.9%
-22.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CTAS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | -0.3% | +4.5% | +4.1% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -1.8% | +2.9% | +0.6% |
| 30D | +2.2% | -0.2% | +2.4% | +2.2% |
| 3M | -2.3% | +11.7% | -14.0% | +0.3% |
| 6M | +23.0% | +0.7% | +22.3% | +23.7% |
| YTD | +61.1% | +7.4% | +53.7% | +64.7% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | -2.1% | +131.2% | +126.6% |
| All | +129.1% | -1.7% | +130.9% | +126.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CTAS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CTAS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CTAS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CTAS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling