+129.1%
ASML vs BLDR
-52.1%
+181.2%
-22.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.2% | +2.5% | +1.7% | +3.5% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -2.8% | +4.0% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +2.2% | -13.3% | +15.5% | +6.0% |
| 3M | -2.3% | -12.3% | +10.0% | +0.8% |
| 6M | +23.0% | -31.5% | +54.4% | +32.7% |
| YTD | +61.1% | -36.1% | +97.1% | +75.4% |
| 1Y | +129.1% | -54.1% | +183.2% | +165.6% |
| All | +129.1% | -52.1% | +181.2% | +165.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling