+84.0%
APLD vs UMC
+209.4%
-125.4%
-53.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | +4.6% | -2.8% | -0.4% |
| 7D | +4.1% | +5.0% | -0.9% | +1.5% |
| 30D | -11.7% | +7.7% | -19.4% | -15.0% |
| 3M | -40.3% | +1.7% | -41.9% | -42.0% |
| 6M | -8.0% | +113.9% | -121.9% | -34.0% |
| YTD | +7.5% | +168.9% | -161.4% | -27.1% |
| 1Y | +84.0% | +207.2% | -123.2% | +28.5% |
| All | +84.0% | +209.4% | -125.4% | +28.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling