+84.0%
APLD vs UMAC
+164.0%
-80.0%
-53.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | -3.1% | +4.8% | +2.7% |
| 7D | +4.1% | -0.9% | +5.0% | +4.4% |
| 30D | -11.7% | -7.7% | -4.1% | -11.6% |
| 3M | -40.3% | -26.4% | -13.8% | -37.5% |
| 6M | -8.0% | +61.9% | -69.8% | -34.0% |
| YTD | +7.5% | +86.5% | -79.0% | -28.7% |
| 1Y | +84.0% | +156.3% | -72.3% | +2.6% |
| All | +84.0% | +164.0% | -80.0% | +2.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling