-46.5%
APLD vs NIO
-54.1%
+7.6%
-67.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.7% | +3.4% | -10.2% | -8.5% |
| 7D | -18.5% | -0.6% | -17.9% | -18.3% |
| 30D | -32.8% | -3.5% | -29.2% | -31.6% |
| 3M | -46.9% | -30.7% | -16.2% | -36.3% |
| 6M | -53.4% | -45.6% | -7.7% | -36.8% |
| YTD | -32.3% | -35.3% | +3.0% | -15.6% |
| 1Y | -46.5% | -53.9% | +7.4% | -10.5% |
| All | -46.5% | -54.1% | +7.6% | -10.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling