+88.8%
APA vs FLNC
+53.3%
+35.5%
-27.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | +1.5% | -4.7% | -3.2% |
| 7D | +0.5% | -4.9% | +5.4% | +0.5% |
| 30D | +23.4% | -27.3% | +50.7% | +23.0% |
| 3M | +12.7% | -61.9% | +74.6% | +12.5% |
| 6M | +39.4% | -34.5% | +73.9% | +39.7% |
| YTD | +79.0% | -47.7% | +126.6% | +80.2% |
| 1Y | +88.8% | +53.3% | +35.5% | +73.2% |
| All | +88.8% | +53.3% | +35.5% | +73.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling