-4.1%
APA vs ENPH
+1,936.5%
-1,940.6%
-93.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10.
| Period | Portfolio | ENPH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.7% | +0.4% | -1.1% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +0.8% | +1.5% | -0.7% | +0.5% |
| 30D | +9.6% | -12.9% | +22.5% | +11.7% |
| 3M | +18.0% | -27.1% | +45.1% | +22.4% |
| 6M | +41.9% | -15.4% | +57.3% | +40.3% |
| YTD | +86.3% | +15.0% | +71.3% | +72.0% |
| 1Y | +97.9% | -0.7% | +98.6% | +85.6% |
| 3Y | +12.8% | -69.3% | +82.1% | +20.6% |
| 5Y | +177.2% | -76.7% | +253.9% | +193.9% |
| All | -4.1% | +1,936.5% | -1,940.6% | -31.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ENPH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ENPH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ENPH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ENPH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling