+37.3%
ANET vs STZ
-10.2%
+47.4%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | STZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -0.7% | +1.9% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -1.9% | +1.1% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -1.9% | +0.1% | -2.2% |
| 3M | +16.7% | -6.2% | +23.0% | +15.1% |
| 6M | +43.7% | -14.0% | +57.7% | +38.5% |
| YTD | +47.9% | -5.1% | +53.0% | +42.3% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | -9.6% | +46.8% | +35.5% |
| All | +37.3% | -10.2% | +47.4% | +35.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling