+16.2%
ANET vs PCG
-14.1%
+30.3%
-24.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.0% | +0.8% | +4.2% | +5.0% |
| 7D | -4.4% | +1.9% | -6.3% | -4.4% |
| 30D | -13.7% | +8.5% | -22.2% | -13.6% |
| 3M | -6.3% | -22.9% | +16.6% | -7.6% |
| 6M | +3.4% | -16.8% | +20.1% | +2.0% |
| YTD | +36.2% | -15.8% | +52.0% | +38.5% |
| 1Y | +16.2% | -16.0% | +32.2% | +22.0% |
| All | +16.2% | -14.1% | +30.3% | +22.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling