+37.3%
ANET vs PCG
-6.6%
+43.9%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | PCG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +2.4% | -1.2% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -13.9% | +13.0% | -0.7% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -16.9% | +15.1% | -1.7% |
| 3M | +16.7% | -14.7% | +31.5% | +16.4% |
| 6M | +43.7% | -23.8% | +67.5% | +43.6% |
| YTD | +47.9% | -10.5% | +58.4% | +47.7% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | -5.1% | +42.4% | +32.4% |
| All | +37.3% | -6.6% | +43.9% | +32.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PCG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PCG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PCG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PCG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling