+37.3%
ANET vs MTB
+23.4%
+13.9%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -0.1% | +1.3% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +1.7% | -2.5% | -0.8% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -4.2% | +2.4% | -2.1% |
| 3M | +16.7% | +8.9% | +7.9% | +17.1% |
| 6M | +43.7% | +10.9% | +32.9% | +42.6% |
| YTD | +47.9% | +21.5% | +26.4% | +50.3% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | +21.9% | +15.3% | +39.5% |
| All | +37.3% | +23.4% | +13.9% | +39.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling