+37.3%
ANET vs MDLZ
+3.3%
+34.0%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MDLZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -0.3% | +1.5% | +1.1% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -1.7% | +0.9% | -1.8% |
| 30D | -1.8% | -2.1% | +0.3% | -2.8% |
| 3M | +16.7% | +1.3% | +15.4% | +18.7% |
| 6M | +43.7% | +6.2% | +37.5% | +47.2% |
| YTD | +47.9% | +15.8% | +32.1% | +57.9% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | +4.1% | +33.1% | +36.4% |
| All | +37.3% | +3.3% | +34.0% | +36.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MDLZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MDLZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MDLZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MDLZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling