+37.3%
ANET vs IEMG
+38.7%
-1.5%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | IEMG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +1.7% | -0.4% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -0.8% | +2.2% | -3.1% | -3.2% |
| 30D | -1.8% | +4.6% | -6.4% | -6.6% |
| 3M | +16.7% | +0.4% | +16.4% | +16.5% |
| 6M | +43.7% | +16.4% | +27.4% | +18.7% |
| YTD | +47.9% | +25.4% | +22.4% | +10.5% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | +38.3% | -1.0% | -6.5% |
| All | +37.3% | +38.7% | -1.5% | -6.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside IEMG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus IEMG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × IEMG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded IEMG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling