+37.3%
ANET vs ARMK
+47.4%
-10.1%
-28.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -0.9% | +2.1% | +1.5% |
| 7D | -0.8% | -2.4% | +1.6% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -1.8% | 0.0% | -1.8% | -1.9% |
| 3M | +16.7% | +6.7% | +10.1% | +14.4% |
| 6M | +43.7% | +38.8% | +4.9% | +29.8% |
| YTD | +47.9% | +55.2% | -7.3% | +33.4% |
| 1Y | +37.3% | +46.6% | -9.3% | +24.4% |
| All | +37.3% | +47.4% | -10.1% | +24.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling