-57.5%
AMZD vs VOO
+102.9%
-160.4%
-74.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -0.6% | +0.8% | -0.7% |
| 7D | +2.9% | -2.0% | +4.9% | 0.0% |
| 30D | +8.0% | -1.7% | +9.7% | +5.4% |
| 3M | -8.5% | +4.7% | -13.2% | -1.3% |
| 6M | -18.3% | +12.6% | -30.8% | -1.1% |
| YTD | -12.5% | +11.8% | -24.2% | +5.1% |
| 1Y | -13.6% | +17.5% | -31.1% | +12.7% |
| 3Y | -50.5% | +77.0% | -127.5% | +30.0% |
| All | -57.5% | +102.9% | -160.4% | +43.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling