+60.4%
AMGN vs ZTS
-49.3%
+109.8%
-16.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -0.6% | -0.9% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -2.0% | +3.1% | +1.4% |
| 30D | +7.8% | +1.9% | +5.9% | +7.4% |
| 3M | +27.3% | -4.0% | +31.3% | +27.6% |
| 6M | +16.8% | -39.1% | +56.0% | +25.5% |
| YTD | +36.3% | -38.8% | +75.1% | +45.9% |
| 1Y | +60.4% | -49.6% | +110.0% | +81.9% |
| All | +60.4% | -49.3% | +109.8% | +81.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling