+60.4%
AMGN vs NCLH
-38.5%
+98.9%
-16.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NCLH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -0.1% | -1.4% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +1.1% | -6.5% | +7.6% | +1.8% |
| 30D | +7.8% | -23.3% | +31.1% | +10.8% |
| 3M | +27.3% | -18.6% | +45.9% | +29.5% |
| 6M | +16.8% | -26.2% | +43.1% | +20.0% |
| YTD | +36.3% | -30.2% | +66.6% | +40.1% |
| 1Y | +60.4% | -39.2% | +99.6% | +67.0% |
| All | +60.4% | -38.5% | +98.9% | +67.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NCLH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NCLH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NCLH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NCLH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling