+65.7%
AMGN vs GTLB
+6.1%
+59.6%
-16.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | 0.0% | +3.7% | +3.7% |
| 7D | +5.9% | -9.7% | +15.6% | +5.5% |
| 30D | +18.7% | +1.7% | +17.0% | +18.9% |
| 3M | +23.4% | +43.6% | -20.2% | +26.3% |
| 6M | +49.7% | +113.0% | -63.2% | +58.3% |
| YTD | +49.2% | +39.5% | +9.6% | +57.5% |
| 1Y | +65.7% | +12.6% | +53.1% | +72.7% |
| All | +65.7% | +6.1% | +59.6% | +72.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling