+65.7%
AMGN vs EAT
+109.8%
-44.1%
-16.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | EAT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.7% | +6.3% | -2.5% | +3.1% |
| 7D | +5.9% | -0.1% | +6.0% | +5.9% |
| 30D | +18.7% | +13.5% | +5.2% | +17.1% |
| 3M | +23.4% | +1.0% | +22.4% | +23.2% |
| 6M | +49.7% | +57.3% | -7.5% | +43.7% |
| YTD | +49.2% | +53.6% | -4.4% | +44.3% |
| 1Y | +65.7% | +110.8% | -45.1% | +63.6% |
| All | +65.7% | +109.8% | -44.1% | +63.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EAT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EAT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EAT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EAT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling