+131.0%
AMDL vs EVRG
+74.4%
+56.6%
-88.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09.
| Period | Portfolio | EVRG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +6.0% | -1.2% | +7.3% | +5.6% |
| 7D | +29.0% | +0.6% | +28.4% | +29.2% |
| 30D | +19.1% | -0.2% | +19.3% | +19.0% |
| 3M | +1.8% | -0.5% | +2.2% | +1.5% |
| 6M | +374.4% | +0.2% | +374.2% | +376.1% |
| YTD | +278.9% | +14.9% | +264.0% | +280.7% |
| 1Y | +510.6% | +18.2% | +492.4% | +527.5% |
| All | +131.0% | +74.4% | +56.6% | +229.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside EVRG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus EVRG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × EVRG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded EVRG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2016-09-09 to 2026-09-09 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling