+188.9%
AMAT vs UMAC
+164.0%
+24.9%
-39.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | -3.1% | +7.4% | +4.7% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -0.9% | -0.6% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -14.8% | -7.7% | -7.1% | -15.0% |
| 3M | -9.3% | -26.4% | +17.2% | -9.2% |
| 6M | +27.4% | +61.9% | -34.5% | +15.3% |
| YTD | +77.6% | +86.5% | -8.9% | +56.1% |
| 1Y | +188.9% | +156.3% | +32.6% | +157.0% |
| All | +188.9% | +164.0% | +24.9% | +157.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling