+188.9%
AMAT vs LNT
+8.1%
+180.9%
-39.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.3% | 0.0% | +4.4% | +4.3% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -0.1% | -1.4% | -1.5% |
| 30D | -14.8% | -3.2% | -11.6% | -16.2% |
| 3M | -9.3% | -4.1% | -5.2% | -10.9% |
| 6M | +27.4% | -4.6% | +32.0% | +25.0% |
| YTD | +77.6% | +7.0% | +70.6% | +84.5% |
| 1Y | +188.9% | +8.3% | +180.7% | +206.3% |
| All | +188.9% | +8.1% | +180.9% | +206.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling