+358.7%
ALAB vs ZCMD
-99.9%
+458.6%
-63.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | -1.7% | -3.6% | -5.3% |
| 7D | +0.6% | -2.0% | +2.6% | +0.6% |
| 30D | -8.8% | -19.8% | +11.0% | -8.5% |
| 3M | -14.0% | -62.1% | +48.1% | -15.8% |
| 6M | +144.3% | -99.5% | +243.8% | +125.7% |
| YTD | +71.0% | -99.7% | +170.8% | +55.5% |
| 1Y | +23.5% | -99.9% | +123.4% | +9.4% |
| All | +358.7% | -99.9% | +458.6% | +324.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
2016-09-10 to 2026-09-10 analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling