+19.6%
AGNC vs MTB
+23.4%
-3.8%
-18.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | MTB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.1% | -0.1% | 0.0% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -1.2% | +1.7% | -2.9% | -1.7% |
| 30D | +0.9% | -4.2% | +5.1% | +2.2% |
| 3M | +7.0% | +8.9% | -1.9% | +4.3% |
| 6M | +3.9% | +10.9% | -7.0% | +0.2% |
| YTD | +8.5% | +21.5% | -12.9% | +2.5% |
| 1Y | +19.6% | +21.9% | -2.4% | +11.9% |
| All | +19.6% | +23.4% | -3.8% | +11.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MTB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MTB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MTB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MTB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling