+18.7%
AEM vs GLDM
+2.8%
+15.9%
-45.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.7% | +3.7% | +6.0% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +0.2% | -0.3% | +0.5% | +0.9% |
| 30D | +0.1% | -1.9% | +1.9% | +3.4% |
| 3M | +22.1% | -0.4% | +22.5% | +25.3% |
| 6M | +2.4% | -10.1% | +12.5% | +20.6% |
| YTD | +8.9% | -5.8% | +14.8% | +18.5% |
| 1Y | +18.7% | +3.1% | +15.6% | +11.2% |
| All | +18.7% | +2.8% | +15.9% | +11.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling