+145.3%
AEHR vs UMAC
+2.9%
+142.4%
-64.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.6% | -10.9% | +4.3% | -2.6% |
| 7D | -5.7% | -26.0% | +20.3% | +5.3% |
| 30D | -41.7% | -40.3% | -1.4% | -29.7% |
| 3M | -44.6% | -51.1% | +6.5% | -30.4% |
| 6M | -28.9% | -5.6% | -23.3% | -30.8% |
| YTD | +201.3% | +2.3% | +199.1% | +163.1% |
| 1Y | +145.3% | +7.9% | +137.5% | +109.9% |
| All | +145.3% | +2.9% | +142.4% | +109.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling